Five-time world chess champion and current world number one, Magnus Carlsen, has stirred controversy with his recent comments on classical chess, labeling it as “probably the worst” format for determining the strongest player. Speaking on the Take Take Take podcast, Carlsen expressed his belief that faster chess formats, such as rapid and blitz, better reflect a player’s overall skills and abilities.
Carlsen’s Views on Classical vs. Faster Chess
Carlsen argues that classical chess is “too forgiving,” allowing players to hide their weaknesses and deficiencies. He stated, “It’s hard to say exactly what measures the best player overall. I would say that right now if you want the kind of chess in which you need the most well-rounded game, classical chess is probably the worst way because it’s sort of too forgiving.” According to Carlsen, faster formats require players to demonstrate a more comprehensive skill set, making them more representative of a “pure sport.”
Faster Chess as a Pure Sport
In contrast to classical chess, which he likened to “science” and “art,” Carlsen emphasized that faster chess is more dynamic and competitive. He noted that these formats demand quick thinking and adaptability, qualities essential for success in the sport. “Faster chess, it is a sport. It’s sort of a pure sport kind of thing,” he explained.
Critique of Recent Championship Match
Carlsen also weighed in on the recent World Championship match between India’s D Gukesh and China’s Ding Liren, which Gukesh won 7.5-6.5. He criticized the quality of play during the match, stating it did not meet the expectations of a World Championship encounter. “This does not look like a game between two World Championship contenders. It just looks like maybe the second round or third round of an open tournament,” Carlsen remarked.
Reactions from Gukesh and Others
Despite his criticisms, Gukesh acknowledged Carlsen’s dominance in the chess world during a post-match press conference in Singapore. “Becoming the world champion does not mean I am the best player; obviously that is Magnus,” he stated, highlighting Carlsen’s enduring reputation as a top player.
Conclusion
Carlsen’s candid remarks about classical chess have sparked discussions within the chess community regarding the relevance and effectiveness of different formats in determining true skill levels. As he continues to advocate for faster formats as a more accurate measure of talent, his insights may influence how future competitions are structured.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is based on current reports and may be subject to change as new data becomes available.
