FIR Filed Against Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah in Land Scam Case
Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah’s political landscape has taken a tumultuous turn as he faces scrutiny in a land scam case. On September 27, Lokayukta Police registered a First Information Report (FIR) against him and several others concerning plot allocations by the Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA). This legal development follows a special court’s directive in Bengaluru on September 18, which prompted the Lokayukta police to initiate an investigation into Siddaramaiah’s alleged misconduct.
Background of the Case
The FIR stems from accusations related to the unlawful allotment of 14 plots to Siddaramaiah’s wife, B.M. Parvati, raising concerns about potential irregularities in the process. The special court’s order, issued by Judge Santosh Gajanan Bhat, was aimed at addressing an RTI complaint filed by activist Snehamoyi Krishna, solidifying the need for a formal inquiry into the alleged wrongdoing.
Legal Framework and Investigation Mandate
The Karnataka High Court, while addressing this case, directed the Lokayukta police to lodge an FIR and conduct a detailed investigation. Under the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), the court mandated the police to submit an investigation report by December 24. This order empowers the police to investigate various offenses, including conspiracy, misappropriation, and corruption, as detailed in multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Key Allegations and Sections Invoked
| Section | Offense Description |
|---|---|
| 120 B | Criminal Conspiracy |
| 166 | Disobedience by Public Servant |
| 403 | Dishonest Misappropriation of Property |
| 406 | Criminal Breach of Trust |
| 420 | Fraud and Dishonest Property Distribution |
| 465 | Forging Documents for Cheating |
| 468 | Forgery for the Purpose of Cheating |
| 340 | Wrongful Confinement |
| 351 | Assault |
Politician’s Defense and Party Support
In light of these serious allegations, Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge publicly expressed his unwavering support for Siddaramaiah, reinforcing the stance that the Chief Minister will not resign amid ongoing investigations. Kharge underscored that no charge sheet has been filed against Siddaramaiah and questioned the opposition’s campaign for his resignation, citing past instances where political figures have not stepped down when faced with legal challenges.
Details of the Allegations
The accusations against Siddaramaiah revolve around alleged favoritism in land allotment schemes where his wife acquired a plot of land in a lucrative area of Mysuru, significantly more valuable than the 3.16 acres surrendered to MUDA. This particular land exchange arrangement, known as the 50:50 ratio scheme, allowed land contributors to receive developed plots in return for undeveloped land, which has become a focal point of contention in this case.
Conclusion
The unfolding legal battle for Siddaramaiah could reshape the political dynamics in Karnataka. With the Lokayukta police’s investigation under way, and clear directives from the court, the coming months are critical for all parties involved, as they navigate the implications of the charges and public sentiment surrounding this scandal.
