Anil Ambani’s Reliance Infra Secures ₹780 Crore Victory Against Damodar Valley Corp in Calcutta High Court

Baishakhi Mondal

Published on:

RCom Wins NCLAT Relief: ₹6.10 Crore Tax Claim Dismissed

Overview of the Case

In a significant legal victory, Reliance Infrastructure Limited, headed by Anil Ambani, has won an arbitration case against the Damodar Valley Corporation (DVC) with a ruling amounting to Rs 780 crore. This judgment was rendered by the Calcutta High Court in West Bengal. Reliance Infrastructure announced this pivotal outcome to the stock markets, reaffirming its longstanding contractual interests in the thermal power sector.

Background of the Project

Over a decade ago, Reliance Infrastructure secured a substantial contract worth Rs 3,750 crore to construct a 1,200 MW thermal power plant in Purulia, West Bengal. However, the completion of the project encountered multiple delays attributed to disputes and various operational challenges. As a result, DVC initiated claims for damages against Reliance Infrastructure, seeking compensation for the alleged delays.

For Experts Recommendation Join Now

Arbitration Proceedings

In response to DVC’s claims, Reliance Infrastructure contested the demands, leading to an arbitration tribunal’s intervention. In 2019, the tribunal ruled favorably for the company, compelling DVC to pay Rs 896 crore to Reliance Infrastructure. However, DVC appealed this ruling in the Calcutta High Court, which recently denied their appeal, effectively upholding the arbitration tribunal’s decision.

Calcutta High Court’s Verdict

The Calcutta High Court, in its latest ruling dated September 27, 2024, delivered a mixed verdict. While the court upheld the arbitration award, it made adjustments regarding the pre-award interest and reduced the total payable amount. As per the court’s decision, DVC is required to pay Rs 780 crore, which includes accrued interest, while also releasing a bank guarantee worth Rs 600 crore.

Future Implications

Reliance Infrastructure has indicated that they will conduct a thorough review of the court’s award and will take further legal advice. Depending on the outcomes of this review, the company may choose to either implement the award or potentially contest the modifications made on September 27, 2024. This decision could have implications in paving the way for future engagements in the power sector.

Conclusion

This arbitration case illustrates the complexities of contractual agreements in high-stakes infrastructure projects. The favorable ruling for Reliance Infrastructure not only reaffirms its position within the energy sector but also potentially sets a precedent for how disputes in similar projects are resolved.

Share This ➥
X